HEX
Server: Apache
System: Linux zacp120.webway.host 4.18.0-553.50.1.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 17 19:10:24 UTC 2025 x86_64
User: govancoz (1003)
PHP: 8.3.26
Disabled: exec,system,passthru,shell_exec,proc_close,proc_open,dl,popen,show_source,posix_kill,posix_mkfifo,posix_getpwuid,posix_setpgid,posix_setsid,posix_setuid,posix_setgid,posix_seteuid,posix_setegid,posix_uname
Upload Files
File: /home/govancoz/mail/.spam/new/1723517337.M468261P1230917.zacp120.ve.host,S=3380,W=3448
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: govancoz+spam@zacp120.ve.host
Received: from zacp120.ve.host
	by zacp120.ve.host with LMTP
	id F+urG5nJumZFyBIAvcbEzQ
	(envelope-from <>)
	for <govancoz+spam@zacp120.ve.host>; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:48:57 +0200
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: candice@govan.co.za
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:48:57 +0200
Received: from inter-mail.inter.net.br ([187.108.207.76]:38972)
	by zacp120.ve.host with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1)
	id 1sdhaj-00000005AAB-244R
	for candice@govan.co.za;
	Tue, 13 Aug 2024 04:48:57 +0200
Received: from inter-mail.inter.net.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by inter-mail.inter.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABF240B61BA;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2024 19:22:00 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from [10.0.0.103] (vc-vb-41-1-81-225.umts.vodacom.co.za [41.1.81.225])
	(Authenticated sender: eugecom@elogica.com.br)
	by inter-mail.inter.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3CAD40B5B0F;
	Mon, 12 Aug 2024 19:15:46 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: Recipients <>
From: "Kristine"<@elogica.com.br>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:49:03 -0400
Reply-To: kristinewellenstein50@gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8
X-Spam-Score: 108
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "zacp120.ve.host",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  
 Content analysis details:   (10.8 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.1 TO_MALFORMED           To: has a malformed address
  2.6 FROM_NO_USER           From: has no local-part before @ sign
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                         [187.108.207.76 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                            [187.108.207.76 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in
                             digit
                             [kristinewellenstein50[at]gmail.com]
  2.0 PYZOR_CHECK            Listed in Pyzor
                             (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
  1.0 REPTO_419_FRAUD_GM_LOOSE Ends-in-digits Reply-To is similar to
                             known advance fee fraud collector mailbox
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE          Message appears to have no textual parts
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Please confirm if your Email is still Active ?